I. Materials A. Notecards B. Print pictures
II. Goals
We want students to be able to...
Talk about each other’s perspectives as opposed to talking at each other
Use counterexamples in efforts to expose limitations in personal knowledge
Consider how knowledge might be different from belief
Challenge understanding of objectivity of knowledge
Introduction A. Introduce ourselves
Notecard Activity (10-15 mins)
Give each student two notecards
1st card
Front face → write 1 thing they know to be true
Back face → write 3 justifications for this claim
2nd card
Front face → write 1 thing they know is not true
Back face → write 3 justifications for this claim
Discussion
Knowledge vs. belief
Limitations of sense perception
Is it possible to know anything for certain?
Descartes: Can only know for certain that you exist...what do they think? TWE is reality perceived experience? Does it matter what we perceive if we can still operate and co-exist with others, even if we all see different things?
Politics related question: Everyday in the news you hear stories about claims related to public officials...how do you know if what they’re saying is true? Does it matter? How could we operate differently?
Audio & Optical Illusions (10 - 15 min) A. Start with a straightforward picture, students say something about it 1. How do you know? (they observe it with their senses) B. Show various optical illusions (and the Yanny / Laurel auditory illusion), get at the idea that your senses might deceive you
D. So how do we know what we know?
Can we ever trust our senses?
Re-apply Descartes -- Can we know anything?
Return to notecards A. Do you still believe in your original claim?
End (5 min) A. Discuss/ask what they learned/what they like doing
This was a great discussion and overall great lesson plan. The writing aspect of our lesson worked extremely well to engage students and challenge them to rethink their initial position. The size of our group (4-5 students) was also critical to the balance of the discussion. We definitely had a few students that pushed the group to examine more philosophical aspects of truth, but each contribution served to advance our collective understanding of how we know what we know as it relates to the position of others. I really liked how we began with individual definitions of truth and ended with a reshaped definition that reflected how our understanding evolved as a group over the course of the class period.